• About

The art and science of the possible

~ A celebration of non-zero sum thinking

The art and science of the possible

Category Archives: complexity

Lightfoot strategy

22 Friday May 2015

Posted by lnedelescu in business, complexity

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

complexity, Emergence, strategy

Light Foot Strategy

There are many models for strategy under uncertainty but few useful metaphors. Just what does strategy under complex, unpredictable conditions look like? Picture yourself attempting to cross a fast moving stream by stepping on small, irregular, slippery and so unstable rocks. Your vision is clear: get to the other side of the stream. You could sit there and contemplate a viable path across the stream, but your plan will be sketchy at best. For one, the water partially obscures many of the stones you’re about to use, making it impossible to make accurate predictions in terms of stability. Off you go. You find out quickly that the best approach is keeping a lightfoot and moving very fast. You never want to lean all your weight on any particular stone. You use each stone with the assumption that it will roll – and so you minimize your time spent on each step. You improvise – you focus on the next viable step, and only see the few stones around it.

Continue reading →

A consulting industry first: strategy architected around complexity principles

25 Tuesday Feb 2014

Posted by lnedelescu in complexity, consulting, design thinking, innovation, knowledge, management, problem solving, strategy

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Alignment, complexity, Criteria, Innovation, Performance, Peter Drucker, phase transitions, Portfolio, Qualitative Leaps, Quantitative, strategy

Image

When people ask me what it is that I do, they often act surprised and sometimes suspicious upon hearing my answer: “I solve wicked problems with undefined parameters”; yes, really.

Continue reading →

Tools are only as effective as the mindsets that employ them

13 Monday Jan 2014

Posted by lnedelescu in complexity, design thinking, Organizational Development, technology

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

CES 2014, Common Sense, complexity, Design Thinking, Karl Popper, Network Theory, Organizational Development, Roger Martin, Technologization, Tools

Image

With the annual Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas attracting worldwide media coverage last week, let me be the one to posit that technological innovation is only as effective as our mental models are able to keep up.

Continue reading →

On why the pursuit of truth is an asymptotic affair

21 Thursday Nov 2013

Posted by lnedelescu in complexity, knowledge, learning, paradox, philosophy, society

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Absolute, Cosmology, divinity, George Box, Knowledge Funnel, Leonardo Da Vinci, models, Murray Gell-mann, Progress, Reality, Roger Martin, Singularity, Sistine Chapel, Truth, Universe

Image

Roger Martin’s “knowledge funnel” is a very useful model for understanding the human pursuit of knowledge. Man contemplates a new mystery using intuition to infer causality, by trial and error arrives at an inexact approach that somehow seems to tame the new mystery before finally framing the new phenomenon with the objective precision of a rigorous formula. This is the process by which the vast unknown is distilled into bits of knowledge that our puny minds can manipulate.

Continue reading →

A brief history of complexity and the mechanisms of resilience

04 Wednesday Sep 2013

Posted by lnedelescu in business, capitalism, complexity, consulting, future, innovation, society, technology

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

complexity, Craftsmanship, Reliability, Resilience

Image

Resilience will receive a lot of attention as the complexity of our world increases. Below is a brief description of the logical correspondence between complexity and resilience, followed by a succinct primer on mechanisms of resilience. But first, a bit of history is in order.

Continue reading →

What’s beyond the knowledge economy shouldn’t scare anyone

22 Saturday Jun 2013

Posted by lnedelescu in capitalism, complexity, Crisis, future, human capital, society, technology

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

automation, Buckminster Fuller, jobs, Knowledge Economy, Kurzweil, labor, Society, specialization, technological singularity

Image

The love-hate relationship of humanity with technology seems to be universal across ages. We love the benefits that technology brings, but hate it when it threatens our jobs, or forces us to learn new skills faster than our comfortable pace.

In the words of Clayton Christensen, one could say that technology is slowly disrupting human labor (and I include here knowledge work). The latest scare for humanity is the so called “technological singularity”, where artificial intelligence learns how to design improved versions of itself, and so exponentially surpasses human intelligence, leaving us humans well…irrelevant. Popular author Kurzweil predicts the year for this around 2045. Less extreme viewpoints still see automation as a major disruptive force to social order as even knowledge workers will be out of jobs in the next few decades. And so the fatalists wonder: how do we deal with the social implications of a few billion unemployed – will anarchy be the norm in 2045?

While the logical thread leading to a fatalist view of the future may seem sound, it is in fact plagued with serious flaws based in a misunderstanding of the differences between silicon and carbon-based intelligence.

Continue reading →

A significant update to my list of foundational thinkers: F. Buckmister Fuller

21 Friday Jun 2013

Posted by lnedelescu in business, capitalism, complexity, design thinking, future, human capital, society

≈ 2 Comments

Tags

architecture, Buckmister Fuller, complexity, Design, Foundational Thinkers, specialization of labor vs. holism, Systems

Image:

I have just come across the incarnation into words of a beautiful positivist and humanist mind of the highest caliber: F Buckminster Fuller. Apparently he is 50 years ahead of my timid attempts at using the converged wisdom of complexity, design and systems to contemplate our society’s potential pitfalls and ways to overcome them. And so, my initial list of foundational thinkers (Ackoff, Jaques, Prigogine and Vester) has just been expanded. I will be studying the implications of Fuller’s profound insights in the near future, but, for now, here is a quotation that takes the duality of my caution-opportunity message in the discontinuity disorder and post-causality pieces even further:

“We are in an age that assumes the narrowing trends of specialization to be logical, natural, and desirable. Consequently, society expects all earnestly responsible communication to be crisply brief. . . . In the meantime, humanity has been deprived of comprehensive understanding. Specialization has bred feelings of isolation, futility, and confusion in individuals. It has also resulted in the individual’s leaving responsibility for thinking and social action to others. Specialization breeds biases that ultimately aggregate as international and ideological discord, which, in turn, leads to war“. – F. Buckminster Fuller

Beyond expertise: how I freed my mind from mechanistic thinking and opened up to paradox, validity and complexity

17 Monday Jun 2013

Posted by lnedelescu in complexity, innovation, knowledge, paradox, problem solving

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Air Traffic, Autonomy, complexity, Corporate Career Path, Limits of Expertise, Limits of Knowledge, Optimization, Professional Fulfillment, Sequential Planning vs. Adaptive Emergence, Subject Matter Expert

Canada-Geese-taking-off-11225

So you think you’re an expert and pretty much have a handle on your domain and the keys to a comfortable ride through life? What if waiting for that 3% raise a year is a form of subtle imprisonment? What if there is much more satisfaction in seeing your life and career as the cumulative list of things you still have to learn rather than as the accumulated knowledge that keeps you safe and comfortable?

Continue reading →

The rising toll of the (still) predominant mechanistic mindset in a complex world

11 Tuesday Jun 2013

Posted by lnedelescu in complexity, Crisis, democracy, future, society

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

causality, Cause and Effect, Charles Handy, complexity, David Hurst, democracy, Ecology, future, Mechanistic, Mindset, Resilience, Robustness, Society, Thinking

Mechanistic_Thinking_EA

Thesis: there is I believe a meta-societal, global shift from robustness to resilience (see this for an intuitive illustration of the difference). This is fueled by an underlying transition from a mechanistic (Industrial Revolution) to a complex-adaptive (Conceptual Economy) worldview.  We have managed to design robust systems (economy, air traffic, healthcare, energy), but not resilient. Robust systems are great for quasi-stable environments, but the price for not having resilience in highly dynamic, networked environments is staggering: $12 trillion for the 2008 financial crisis, and counting. Unless we learn how to design resilient systems, likely through the application of complexity principles, democracy itself may be at risk.

Continue reading →

Effective strategy in complex environments, or why a complex world requires abstract thinking

06 Thursday Jun 2013

Posted by lnedelescu in complexity, consulting, human capital, management, strategy, taxonomy

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Abductive Reasoning, abstract thinking, antifragility, Art, business schools, Categorization, complexity, Daniel Pink, Dave Snowden, hierarchy, integrative thinking, management consulting, Management Theory, mental models, Nassim Taleb, right brain thinking, Roger Martin, Sense Making, statistical analysis, strategy, weak-signals

dalisurreal

As I have recently argued, the world’s top strategists agree that strategy in complex, cause-and-effect blurred environments requires a unique mindset.

According to Snowden and others, in complex environments cause and effect relationships do not repeat and a categorization mindset where data is fit to preconceived notions about reality (i.e. models, frameworks, etc.) is ineffective. This by the way rules out most of the consultants who provide precisely this: prescription style, a-la-carte frameworks and models. What works are sense-making models (to understand the distinction between categorization and sense-making in the words of the world’s top strategists, see my related blog). Categorization models are fast and efficient, but may miss so called “weak signals”, comparatively insignificant data points that are simply part of the average in normal situations, but which can be the source of new emergent patterns in complex circumstances – fat tails and Black Swans respectively in Nassim Taleb parlance.

Continue reading →

← Older posts

Categories

business capitalism Communication complexity consulting Crisis democracy design thinking Emerging Markets future human capital innovation Investment knowledge learning management Organizational Development paradox philosophy problem solving sales science society strategy taxonomy technology Uncategorized

Latest

  • Intelligence is Intentional
  • Plenty of Room at the Top: the case for a viable man-machine economic future
  • What does an “innovation economy” really mean?
  • Lightfoot strategy
  • Capital: a brief philosophy

Archives

  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • August 2014
  • June 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Follow Following
    • The art and science of the possible
    • Join 151 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • The art and science of the possible
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...