• About

The art and science of the possible

~ A celebration of non-zero sum thinking

The art and science of the possible

Monthly Archives: January 2013

The “you’re all a bunch of idiots” paradox

23 Wednesday Jan 2013

Posted by lnedelescu in business, learning, paradox

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

paradox, TED

Image

We live in a brand society. Build yourself a big enough personal brand, and you get away with crazy things. Be unknown, you are likely to offend even if you didn’t intend.

Let’s exemplify the paradox: gurus are often invited to enlighten an audience. Corporations for example send their up and coming executives to listen to innovation gurus. Sometimes the innovation guru points out how wrong they are doing everything. The message can be paraphrased as “you’re all a bunch of idiots”. The result? Wild applause and appreciation. How fresh the perspective! How insightful and thought provoking! The seminar is deemed as mind-altering and profound.

But as one of the biggest thinkers of all time said, “we don’t recognize that teaching is a major obstruction to learning” (Russell Ackoff). That is because learning cannot be acquired by listening, it has to be experienced. So listening to a guru’s past experiences will produce little learning. You will learn little from my mistakes.

And so, following one of these thought provoking sessions, each of the parties goes happily its own way, with the state of things pretty much unchanged: the guru is paid and his or her brand confirmed, while the audience has checked the corporate or personal check-box for “learning”.

Let’s keep applauding, it feels great, doesn’t it? Given the right setting, being called an idiot can be liberating. Not to mention that cozy group feeling of “I’m not alone in my ignorance”!

Davos, innovation and the future of capitalism

23 Wednesday Jan 2013

Posted by lnedelescu in capitalism, democracy, future, innovation, society, taxonomy

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Ackoff, Capitalism, Christensen, Davos, Drucker, effectiveness, Innovation, management, Martin, Responsibility, Thought Leader

Image

Many of the sessions at Davos 2013 contain “innovation” in the title. Two of the top names in management and innovation are present as well: Clayton Christensen and Roger Martin. Unfortunately, the fact they speak with separate voices about the same underlying phenomena is not helping their cause, which holds more potential for true transformation of the world economy than many of the purely economic insights of the typical Davos crowd:

http://edition.cnn.com/2013/01/21/business/opinion-clayton-christensen/index.html

http://www.rogerlmartin.com/wp-content/themes/rm2009/pdfs/strategy_issue23_thinkingbydesign.pdf

Peter Drucker and Russell Ackoff have 20-30 years ago explained the fundamentals behind the phenomena observed by both Christensen and Martin: in essence effectiveness trumps efficiency. Christensen and Martin thus have a great responsibility, that of acknowledging each other so as to not fragment the legacy of Drucker and Ackoff’s schools of thought; in today’s environment the urgency is such that we can’t afford recreating the Tower of Babel experiment. But even if they and others like them (Dave Snowden, David Hurst, Fredmund Malik, etc.) were to speak with one voice, the real decision makers at Davos will have little clue as to what these two guys are talking about. That is because one can only fully absorb something one can relate to personal experience. Decision makers cannot be taught, even if they had the humility to listen (relevant Ackoff quote: “We don’t recognize that teaching is a major obstruction to learning […] Who in the classroom learns the most…. the teacher. See the classroom is upside down.”).

Categories

business capitalism Communication complexity consulting Crisis democracy design thinking Emerging Markets future human capital innovation Investment knowledge learning management Organizational Development paradox philosophy problem solving sales science society strategy taxonomy technology Uncategorized

Latest

  • Intelligence is Intentional
  • Plenty of Room at the Top: the case for a viable man-machine economic future
  • What does an “innovation economy” really mean?
  • Lightfoot strategy
  • Capital: a brief philosophy

Archives

  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • August 2014
  • June 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012

Blog at WordPress.com.

Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Follow Following
    • The art and science of the possible
    • Join 151 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • The art and science of the possible
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar