• About

The art and science of the possible

~ A celebration of non-zero sum thinking

The art and science of the possible

Monthly Archives: June 2013

The foundations and future of economics

26 Wednesday Jun 2013

Posted by lnedelescu in future, innovation, society

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

economics, foundations, future, human evolution, Invention, knowledge work, labor, metaphysics, Physics, politics, predicament, Technology

Image

I’ve often wondered whether economics can be called a fundamental “science.” Much like physics can describe the rules of the game we call “reality” without a definitive answer as to how the game was set in motion in the primordial universe, so does economics seem to me to focus primarily on transactional mechanisms for value without a profound appreciation for how value materializes out of grey matter. Money is, or should be, an accurate measure of value, but ever since we moved away from bartering we have forever decoupled our transactional mechanisms (either in time or measure) from fundamental value, allowing us additional transactional flexibility in time and space, but also resulting in economic cycles, nothing more than periodic corrections to the coupling mechanisms.

Continue reading →

Life lessons – some DOs and DON’Ts for new entrepreneurs

26 Wednesday Jun 2013

Posted by lnedelescu in business

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

business, Communication, Decision Making, dos and don'ts, Entrepreneurship, lessons learnt, wisdom, work delegation

Image

So you’re a new entrepreneur. Here’s some snippets of wisdom from my entrepreneurial experience in the form of DOs and DON’Ts that might help:

Continue reading →

Life lessons – on compromise and conflict, and the importance of chemistry

25 Tuesday Jun 2013

Posted by lnedelescu in Crisis, Organizational Development, Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

compromise, conflict, Crisis, organizational chemistry

Image

Compromise when you can, but accept that sometimes conflict is unavoidable.

Conflict is always lurking, only a well articulated opinion away. But sometimes conflict is irrational, it has nothing to do with what one thinks or does. Conflict can appear simply because of the way someone is reflects badly by contrast on what someone else is not.

Continue reading →

A visual tribute to design and creativity, and to the unity of art and science in the human spirit

23 Sunday Jun 2013

Posted by lnedelescu in design thinking, human capital, innovation, society

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Art, Brancusi, Buckminster, Celibidache, Dali, Human Spirit, science, Society, Tesla, Zuze

Image

ImageImageImageImage

Image

In order of appearance: Buckminster, Brancusi, Dali, Celibidache, Tesla, Zuze

What’s beyond the knowledge economy shouldn’t scare anyone

22 Saturday Jun 2013

Posted by lnedelescu in capitalism, complexity, Crisis, future, human capital, society, technology

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

automation, Buckminster Fuller, jobs, Knowledge Economy, Kurzweil, labor, Society, specialization, technological singularity

Image

The love-hate relationship of humanity with technology seems to be universal across ages. We love the benefits that technology brings, but hate it when it threatens our jobs, or forces us to learn new skills faster than our comfortable pace.

In the words of Clayton Christensen, one could say that technology is slowly disrupting human labor (and I include here knowledge work). The latest scare for humanity is the so called “technological singularity”, where artificial intelligence learns how to design improved versions of itself, and so exponentially surpasses human intelligence, leaving us humans well…irrelevant. Popular author Kurzweil predicts the year for this around 2045. Less extreme viewpoints still see automation as a major disruptive force to social order as even knowledge workers will be out of jobs in the next few decades. And so the fatalists wonder: how do we deal with the social implications of a few billion unemployed – will anarchy be the norm in 2045?

While the logical thread leading to a fatalist view of the future may seem sound, it is in fact plagued with serious flaws based in a misunderstanding of the differences between silicon and carbon-based intelligence.

Continue reading →

Never be afraid to ask crazy questions, or in Buckminster Fuller’s words, dare to be naive

22 Saturday Jun 2013

Posted by lnedelescu in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Buckminster Fuller, creativity, inquiry, philosophy, Questions, Reality, Reflexivity, thoughts, Yin and Yan

Image

“There are no stupid questions” has become an accepted cliche. But then again, you’ve never run into my flavor of “stupid” questions. Joking aside, I was never afraid of stupid questions. Rather it is some of the questions I have asked of myself in the past that scare me into thinking I might have lost it. I want to give you two such examples that scared me at first, only to find that others have thought those same apparently crazy thoughts. Which is not to say I am not crazy, but rather than I am not the only crazy one. And that my friends, sits just fine with me!

Let me time-teleport you with a younger version of myself, laying sleeplessly in bed on a dark night about thirteen years ago. I decided to really challenge myself with the toughest question I could invent. Being that it was night and dark, my mind of course jumped to alien abductions. I asked myself: if aliens suddenly abducted me that very night, and decided to see how smart the human race really is, what would they ask me?

Continue reading →

A significant update to my list of foundational thinkers: F. Buckmister Fuller

21 Friday Jun 2013

Posted by lnedelescu in business, capitalism, complexity, design thinking, future, human capital, society

≈ 2 Comments

Tags

architecture, Buckmister Fuller, complexity, Design, Foundational Thinkers, specialization of labor vs. holism, Systems

Image:

I have just come across the incarnation into words of a beautiful positivist and humanist mind of the highest caliber: F Buckminster Fuller. Apparently he is 50 years ahead of my timid attempts at using the converged wisdom of complexity, design and systems to contemplate our society’s potential pitfalls and ways to overcome them. And so, my initial list of foundational thinkers (Ackoff, Jaques, Prigogine and Vester) has just been expanded. I will be studying the implications of Fuller’s profound insights in the near future, but, for now, here is a quotation that takes the duality of my caution-opportunity message in the discontinuity disorder and post-causality pieces even further:

“We are in an age that assumes the narrowing trends of specialization to be logical, natural, and desirable. Consequently, society expects all earnestly responsible communication to be crisply brief. . . . In the meantime, humanity has been deprived of comprehensive understanding. Specialization has bred feelings of isolation, futility, and confusion in individuals. It has also resulted in the individual’s leaving responsibility for thinking and social action to others. Specialization breeds biases that ultimately aggregate as international and ideological discord, which, in turn, leads to war“. – F. Buckminster Fuller

It is through strategy and invention that morality and profitability become symbiotic

21 Friday Jun 2013

Posted by lnedelescu in business, capitalism, Organizational Development, society, strategy

≈ 2 Comments

Tags

2008 financial crisis, business, Enron, Invention, Machiavelli, Morality, Society, Speculation, strategy, Wall Street

Image

With Enron still in recent collective memory, business has not fully recovered its morality and ethics standing. And the 2008 financial crisis didn’t help, in fact lowering trust in the world’s business establishment. So the question of whether morality and profitability in business can be symbiotic is fair. I had not really formed an opinion on this issue until the very recent past, when several incidents in my professional life gave me no choice but to do so.

And so, having pondered the issue, I believe there is an answer that constructively transcends the growing divide between the pro-profit and anti-corporate, anti-globalization groups. In short, business success doesn’t have to be synonymous with immorality. The key to achieving a symbiosis between profitability and morality is in my opinion a combination of strategy and invention.

Continue reading →

Why it may take crisis to become a better integrative thinker

17 Monday Jun 2013

Posted by lnedelescu in business, Crisis, design thinking

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Creative Tension, Crisis, integrative thinking, problem solving, Roger Martin, Short Term vs. Long term

Image

They say mistakes are key to learning. Having had my share, I couldn’t agree more. But I would say while mistakes are great learning experiences, crises exercise a unique mental capacity for (wicked) problem solving: integrative thinking.

Roger Martin defines integrative thinking as the “ability to constructively face the tensions of opposing models, and instead of choosing one at the expense of the other, generating a creative solution of the tensions in the form of a new model that contains elements of the individual models, but is superiors to each”.

Continue reading →

Beyond expertise: how I freed my mind from mechanistic thinking and opened up to paradox, validity and complexity

17 Monday Jun 2013

Posted by lnedelescu in complexity, innovation, knowledge, paradox, problem solving

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Air Traffic, Autonomy, complexity, Corporate Career Path, Limits of Expertise, Limits of Knowledge, Optimization, Professional Fulfillment, Sequential Planning vs. Adaptive Emergence, Subject Matter Expert

Canada-Geese-taking-off-11225

So you think you’re an expert and pretty much have a handle on your domain and the keys to a comfortable ride through life? What if waiting for that 3% raise a year is a form of subtle imprisonment? What if there is much more satisfaction in seeing your life and career as the cumulative list of things you still have to learn rather than as the accumulated knowledge that keeps you safe and comfortable?

Continue reading →

← Older posts

Categories

business capitalism Communication complexity consulting Crisis democracy design thinking Emerging Markets future human capital innovation Investment knowledge learning management Organizational Development paradox philosophy problem solving sales science society strategy taxonomy technology Uncategorized

Latest

  • Intelligence is Intentional
  • Plenty of Room at the Top: the case for a viable man-machine economic future
  • What does an “innovation economy” really mean?
  • Lightfoot strategy
  • Capital: a brief philosophy

Archives

  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • August 2014
  • June 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012

Blog at WordPress.com.

Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Follow Following
    • The art and science of the possible
    • Join 151 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • The art and science of the possible
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...